History
  • No items yet
midpage
McKenzie v. . Ashe
2 N.C. 502
Sup. Ct. N.C.
1797
Check Treatment

Whatever the rules of racing decide in such a case should be the standard of decision now, the rule of law being that if he is entitled to the penalty by the rules of racing, he is so by law.

The jury were divided, and a juror withdrawn.

See McKenzie v. Ashe, 3 N.C. 161; Hunter v. Bynum, ibid., 354.

NOTE BY REPORTER. — Upon inquiry after the trial, several persons well experienced in racing gave it as their decided opinion that no accident whatever could exempt the defendant from forfeiture in case of failure, unless he had expressly provided against it by his agreement.

NOTE BY ANNOTATOR. — All bets were made illegal. Laws 1810, ch. 796, now C. S., 2142, 2143; Gooch v. Faucett. 122 N.C. 270.

*Page 1

Case Details

Case Name: McKenzie v. . Ashe
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 5, 1797
Citation: 2 N.C. 502
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.