midpage

McKeever v. BarrMcKeever v. Barr

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 21, 2020
19-307
Versions:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Statement of JUSTICE BREYER respecting the denial of certiorari.

In the decision below, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that a district court could not authorize the release of grand jury information except as specifically enumerated in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). 920 F. 3d 842, 850 (2019). That decision is in conflict with the decisions of several other Circuits, which have indicated that district courts retain inherent authority to release grand jury material in other appropriate cases. See, e.g., Carlson v. United States, 837 F. 3d 753, 766–767 (CA7 2016); In re Craig, 131 F. 3d 99, 105 (CA2 1997); In re Hastings, 735 F. 2d 1261, 1271–1272 (CA11 1984). It also appears to conflict with the considered views of the Rules Committee. See Advisory Committee Minutes on Crim. Rules 7 (Apr. 22–23 2012), https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fr_import/criminal-min-04-2012.pdf.

Whether district courts retain authority to release grand jury material outside those situations specifically enumerated in the Rules, or in situations like this, is an important question. It is one I think the Rules Committee both can and should revisit.

Case Details

Case Name: McKeever v. Barr
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 21, 2020
Citations: 140 S.Ct. 597; 19-307
Docket Number: 19-307
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In