McKee v. WestMcKee v. West
Thе bill in this case is filed by a creditor and seeks to have a certain deed executed by the debtor, and a certain mortgagе executed by the grantees of the debtor, set aside as fraudulent. The bill charges that Mrs. M. J. Williams, being at the time indebted to the comрlainant, made a voluntary conveyance of the lands described, to her two daughters, Mrs. Mattie Langford and Emma Williams, the considеration of love and affection being expressed on its face, and that said
The respondent by special pleas set up the defense of boncu fide purchaser for value without notice of complainant’s equity. The cause was submitted upon the sufficiency of the pleas, and a decree Avas rendered holding the pleas insufficient, and from this decree the present appeal is prosecuted.
The setting down of the pleas for hearing upon their sufficiency Avas an admission of the facts averred in them. — Ency. Pl. & Pr., vol. 16, p. 620. The avermеnts of facts necessary to be stated in setting up the defense of a bona fide purchaser, were sufficiently pleaded within the rule herеtofore laid down by this court in the following named cases: Wood v. Holley Mfg. Co.,
The theory of the complainant is, and upon this theory his contention is based, that the deed from Mrs. Williams to her two daughters being a voluntary conveyance, was per se fraudulent and void as to existing creditors, and that a subsequent conveyance by them to one Avith notice of the fraudulent character of the first conveyance, Avould likеwise be void as to such creditor, and subject to be set aside at his instance on a bill by him in equity for that purpose. And it is further contended that the voluntary conveyance expressing on its face only a good consideration, that is, of love and eifection, puts the subsequent purchaser on notice of its fraudulent character. The question presented by this latter contention is the determining one in the case. The plea' setting np the defense of bona fide purchaser, admits a knowledge of the contents of the dеed from Mrs. Williams to her tAvo daughters, and that the consideration therein expressed is for love and affection, but the plea denies any notice of the existence of complainant’s debt,
It lias been held and so decided by some courts, that a purchaser from a fraudulent grantee, occupied no higher or better position than the fraudulent grantee, where such conveyance was assailed by a creditor. The question was considered in Thames v. Rembert’s Admr.,
It is not to be questioned, that a voluntary conveyance, that is, one founded upon the consideration of love and affectiоn, is valid between the parties. When the grantor, at the time of its execution is indebted, the law stamps such conveyance per se fraudulеnt as against his existing creditors, and subject to be set aside when assailed by them. It is not the voluntary nature of the conveyance аlone which renders it in law fraudulent, but that fact, when accompanied with the additional fact of indebtedness on the part of thе grantor at the time of its execution. Where no actual fraud exists with reference to future or subsequent creditors in the execution of the conveyance-, and no existing or present indebtedness on the part of the grantor, no one would
Admitting the facts to be true as stated in the special pleas, the respondent McKee, is in equity entitlеd to pro-, tection as a bona fide purchaser without notice. It follows, therefore, that the decree holding the pleas insufficient must be reversed, and one will be here rendered holding the pleas sufficient.
Reversed and rendered.