McKee v. Thomas, 9 Kan. 343

McKee v. Thomas

9 Kan. 343 | Kan. | 1872

Thd opinion of the court was delivered by

Kingman, C. J.:

For the reasons given in the case of Higginbotham v. Thomas, decided at this term, the judgment ;n this case is affirmed.' (Ante, pp. 328, 334). The plaintiffs *344in error rely also upon an estoppel; but as we understand that doctrine it does not apply to this case.

Valentine, J., concurring. Brewer, J., not sitting in the ease.