History
  • No items yet
midpage
McIntire v. Wing
113 Pa. 67
Pa.
1886
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was filed

Per Curiam.

There is no error in the refusal of the court to take off the compulsoiy nonsuit. The evidence wholly failed to show that the defendants were in possession of the land in question; They were not served with the writ by the sheriff. The presumption of possession created by the statute, when the sheriff makes return under oath that he has duly served the writ on the defendants, does not exist. While an appearance and plea by counsel may lead to a verdict and judgment against the defendants, yet on the trial, it is necessary to prove that they were in possession of the premises. Failing in this, the nonsuit was properly entered. This view makes it unnecessary to consider the other questions.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McIntire v. Wing
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 24, 1886
Citation: 113 Pa. 67
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.