140 Cal. App. 317 | Cal. Ct. App. | 1934
This is an action brought by the widow and minor son of one Bert J. McIntee against defendant Ammerman and other defendants to recover damages for the death of said Bert J. McIntee, caused by the negligence of the defendant Ammerman in the operation of an automobile. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. Plaintiffs moved for a new trial, and the court granted the motion as to defendant Ammerman, upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict. Defendant Ammerman appeals from the order granting the motion for a new trial.
The grounds of appeal as stated by appellant are: that there was nncontradieted testimony without any conflict whatever which entitled appellant to the verdict which the
The order is affirmed.
Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.