McGuirk v. City of New York
285 N.Y. 596 | NY | 1941
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *598 Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH and LEWIS, JJ. Dissenting: RIPPEY, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ., on the ground that it was a question of fact whether under all the circumstances the defendant exercised such care as was required in the exercise of ordinary prudence.
