753 N.Y.S.2d 380 | N.Y. App. Div. | 2003
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the defen
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the Supreme Court correctly dismissed the action without prejudice to the plaintiff recommencing the action pursuant to CPLR 205 (a). Where the defendants have been given timely notice of the claim being asserted by or on behalf of the injured party, an error relating to the identity of the named plaintiff in the original action will not bar recommencement of the action pursuant to CPLR 205 (a) (see Carrick v Central Gen. Hosp., 51 NY2d 242; George v Mt. Sinai Hosp., 47 NY2d 170; Chase Manhattan Bank v Wolowitz, 272 AD2d 428, 429; Krainski v Sullivan, 208 AD2d 904). Florio, J.P., O’Brien, Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.