No. 8484 | Ind. | Nov 15, 1881
— The appellant was elected and served a term as city judge of the city of Logansport, under the act of March 12th, 1875. 1 R. S. 1876, p. 314. This action was brought to recover the rental value of the room occupied by the appellant as a city court room, it being averred that the room was in the possession of the appellant as lessee of another, and that the appellee, by a resolution of its common council, designated it as the place where the city court should be held, from which, as the appellant claims, there arose an implied promise on the part of the appellee to pay him the reasonable value of the use and occupation.
By the 52d section of the act concerning cities, 1 R. S. 1876, p. 288, it is provided that “No member of the common council, or other officer of such city shall, either directly or indirectly, be a party to or in any manner interested in any contract or agreement with such city for any matter, cause or thing by which any liability or indebtedness is in any way or manner created against such city; and if any contract should be made in contravention of the foregoing provisions, the same shall be null and void.”
The specific ruling of which the appellant complains is the refusal of the court to admit in evidence the record of the proceedings of the common council, and certain parol evidence in support thereof, for the purpose of showing the adoption
.Judgment affirmed, with costs.