McGlynn v. Ellis
123 A. 373 | N.J. | 1923
NOTE — The per curiam opinion in this case was reported in
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, BERGEN, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, WHITE, HEPPEN-HEIMER, ACKERSON, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
*1