251 Mass. 173 | Mass. | 1925
The defendant Charles D. Rood, the appellant, contends, that the fifth paragraph of the final decree is erroneous. It provides “ That the mortgage on personal property of the Quaboag Realty Associates, dated June 25, 1921, given by the defendant Loudon to the defendant Rood to secure the payment of money loaned to the defendant Loudon for which he gave the. defendant Rood a note of the Quaboag Realty Associates for $2,000, was not recorded as required by law and is not a valid mortgage as against the plaintiff. The defendant Rood is ordered to cancel and discharge the same.” The master, to whose report Rood took no exceptions, finds that the mortgage in question of an automobile and fourteen head of livestock was not recorded within fifteen days from the date written in the instrument as required by G. L. c. 255, § 1. The appellant, while conceding it was valid only as between the parties, or those claiming under them, argues that, the mortgage having been given in the name of the Quaboag Realty Associates, organized under a written declaration of trust with a capital of one hundred transferable shares, ninety-eight of which were owned by Loudon, the bankrupt and managing trustee, who pledged them to Rood to secure his personal loans other than the loan in question, the receiver is a shareholder, or associate, and therefore a party to the mortgage.
If Loudon was adjudged a bankrupt, the trustee would have all the rights of a judgment creditor, against whom the mortgage on the record would have been void. U. S. St. 1898, c. 541, § 47 a, (2), as amended by U. S. St. 1910, c. 412. Haskell v. Merrill, 179 Mass. 120. Clark v. Williams, 190 Mass. 219. Goodrich v. Dore, 194 Mass. 493. See Duffy v. Charak, 236 U. S. 97, where it was assumed that a
The decree must be affirmed with costs of the appeal.
Ordered accordingly.
