History
  • No items yet
midpage
McGehee v. . Tucker
122 N.C. 186
N.C.
1898
Check Treatment

Whether the intestate of the defendant died seized of realty is an indispensable fact to be ascertained before the application of the statute of limitations can be determined. The pleadings raise an issue as to that fact, but counsel by agreement reserved the ascertainment thereof and presented a hypothetical proposition of law to the Court. The Court will not entertain fragmentary or premature appeals. Clark's Code, section 584, and cases cited. Hinton v. Ins Co., 116 N.C. 22. As was said by Pearson,C. J., in Hamlin v. Tucker, 72 N.C. 502, the Court will not "take two bites at a cherry."

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Griffin v. Cupp, 167 N.C. 96.

(190)

Case Details

Case Name: McGehee v. . Tucker
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Apr 12, 1898
Citation: 122 N.C. 186
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.