History
  • No items yet
midpage
McGee v. S. M. Freeman Son
1924 Ala. LEXIS 70
| Ala. | 1924
|
Check Treatment

The bill of exceptions does not recite that it contains all of the evidence.

Where a case is tried and determined by the court without a jury, and the bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all of the evidence, this court will presume any state of the evidence to sustain the judgment rendered on the facts. 1 Mich. Ala. Dig. p. 506, § 907; 13 Mich. Ala. Dig. p. 151, § 907.

The granting or refusal of a continuance, under the circumstances, was within the discretion of the trial court, and such discretion was not abused. Knowles v. Blue, 209 Ala. 27,95 So. 481; Murph v. State, 153 Ala. 67, 45 So. 208; Wimberly v. Windham, 104 Ala. 409, 16 So. 23, 53 Am. St. Rep. 70; 1 Mich. Ala. Dig. p. 540, § 966.

The judgment is affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McGee v. S. M. Freeman Son
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Oct 23, 1924
Citation: 1924 Ala. LEXIS 70
Docket Number: 6 Div. 213.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.