History
  • No items yet
midpage
McGarrity v. McMahon
240 Pa. 553
Pa.
1913
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

While the court below gave no reason for refusing fo open the judgment against the appellant, it is safe to assume that her petition was dismissed because it appeared from the depositions that she had given her obligation to the appellee as an original undertaking on her part, for a valuable consideration passing directly to her, and not for an antecedent debt of her husband. It is for this reason that the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: McGarrity v. McMahon
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 5, 1913
Citation: 240 Pa. 553
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 399
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.