History
  • No items yet
midpage
McElheny v. Pittsb. Ry. Co.
147 Pa. 1
Pa.
1892
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The single assignment of error is to the admission of evidence as to the location and height of the highway bridge. It is sufficient to say, in answer to this objection, that the subject was introduced by the appellant upon the cross-examination of the plaintiffs’ witness. If we concede that it would not have been competent evidence in chief on the part of the plaintiffs, the defendant having brought it out, the plaintiffs were clearly entitled to follow it up by the questions referred to.

Judgment affirmed. C.

Case Details

Case Name: McElheny v. Pittsb. Ry. Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 4, 1892
Citation: 147 Pa. 1
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 258
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.