History
  • No items yet
midpage
McDowell v. Guinta
421 So. 2d 810
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1982
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Although appellants have demonstrated procedural error, they have failed to establish that they were prejudiced thereby. The record reflects several technical procedural errors by the trial court in allowing the appellee to proceed on pleadings that would usually merit dismissal with an opportunity to replead. Notwithstanding these errors the substance of the appellee’s claims were properly before the court, and the appellants were sufficiently apprised of those claims to bar the necessity of a retrial. This was, in essence, the view of the trial court in allowing the appellee to present her claims to the jury. Obligated as we are not to place form over substance, the trial court’s decision should be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McDowell v. Guinta
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 17, 1982
Citation: 421 So. 2d 810
Docket Number: No. 81-1134
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.