History
  • No items yet
midpage
McDonnell v. Cohen
252 A.D. 277
N.Y. App. Div.
1937
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The board of elections -were within then rights when they reconsidered their original determination and rejected the petition. This ruling cast on the appellants the burden of establishing that the petition contained the required number of valid signatures. It was conceded upon the argument that this was not established by the record before us. The record does contain affirmative proof tending to support the ruling of the board.

The orders should be affirmed.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

In McDonnell proceeding: Order unanimously affirmed.

In Nagler proceeding: Order unanimously affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McDonnell v. Cohen
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 27, 1937
Citation: 252 A.D. 277
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.