There is no brief filed for the appellant in this cause, but his insistence is set forth in the motion for a new trial, in which he assigns four grounds: (1) That the verdict was contrary to the evidence; (2) that there was not sufficient evidence to support the verdict; (3) because the court refused to give the affirmative charge as requested by the defendant; and (4) that there was not sufficient evidence to support the judgment. We have carefully examined the evidence in this case, and are of the opinion that it was a question for the jury under the facts, and that the entire case was submitted to the jury under a full, fair, and impartial charge from the trial court. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is in all things affirmed. Affirmed.
McDonald v. State
17 Ala. App. 695
Ala. Ct. App.1919Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.