35382 | Ga. | Sep 26, 1979
In this contempt action, the order of the trial court — that the parties’ two children may enroll at the University of Georgia and that the defendant father shall pay expenses as provided by the parties’ agreement incorporated in the final divorce decree, but specifically not ruling on the contempt or attorney fees issues at that time — was interlocutory. There is nothing to the contrary in the holding in Ramsey v. Ramsey, 231 Ga. 334" court="Ga." date_filed="1973-10-25" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/ramsey-v-ramsey-1278026?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1278026">231 Ga. 334 (1) (201 SE2d 429) (1973), that "the provisions of Code Ann. § 6-701(a,3) authorize the appeal of a trial court judgment adjudicating contempt without first making an application for discharge. Such an appeal may be taken from a contempt order irrespective of whether the order found to have been wilfully violated is an interlocutory order or a final judgment.” (Emphasis supplied.) In the present case, unlike Ramsey, there was no "judgment adjudicating contempt.” Cf. Duvall v. Baker, 244 Ga. 228" court="Ga." date_filed="1979-09-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/duvall-v-baker-5596934?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5596934">244 Ga. 228
Appeal dismissed.