McDonald v. City of New YorkMcDonald v. City of New York
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered January 5, 1990, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, the City of New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff, a former police officer, fell down allegedly defective stairs at a 100 year old police stationhouse. Submission of the case on the theory of res ipsa loquitur was properly denied as the plaintiff did not establish that his fall was the kind of event which ordinarily does not occur absent someone’s negligence. (See generally, Ebanks v New York City Tr. Auth.,
Further, the Court properly declined to charge the jury with respect to the maintenance provisions in the Administrative Code and OSHA Regulations where plaintiff failed, in his burden, to demonstrate that such aforesaid provisions were in fact applicable to the City as both an employer and building owner.
The claim that defense counsel’s summation remarks deprived plaintiff of a fair trial, is unpreserved for failure to object. (Gaile v Cillo,
We have considered the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.