History
  • No items yet
midpage
McDermott v. Lapham
18 R.I. 295
R.I.
1893
Check Treatment

We are of the opinion that the question whether or not a list of names from which supervisors are to be selected is presented by a proper town committee, is not a jurisdictional fact, and therefore not reviewable on a petition for a writ of certiorari. The statute, Pub. Laws R.I. cap. 920, § 16, of May 1, 1891, makes it the peremptory duty of the town council to appoint supervisors who shall be of the opposite political parties; the provision that they are to be selected from a list presented by the town committees of the opposite political parties appears to be incidental to the appointment as affording a convenient mode of furnishing names to the council from which to make a selection. It would apparently be their duty to make the appointment whether the lists were presented to them or not.

Petition denied and dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: McDermott v. Lapham
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: Jun 3, 1893
Citation: 18 R.I. 295
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.