History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCutcheon v. Rivers
68 Mo. 122
Mo.
1878
Check Treatment
Napton, J.

This suit was brought to recover back $37.50 paid Rivers as agent of an insurance company in Philadelphia, about ten days after the superintendent, in St. Louis, had revoked the license of the company to do *124business in this State. The publication of the fact of revocation is required to be for four weeks. The agent in Jasper county, the defendant, did not see it, and therefore took the premium. The majority of this court are of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover, that the revocation of the license is the material fact, that the four-weeks publication is intended to distribute the information as- extensivety as possible, but that the agencies cease when recalled and notice is given. Judgment affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McCutcheon v. Rivers
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Oct 15, 1878
Citation: 68 Mo. 122
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.