History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCrea v. State
210 So. 2d 724
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1968
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The principal point on this appeal is that the trial judge committed error during the progress of the trial by making comments, in the presence of the jury, in regard to one of the co-defendants. No objection to the remarks of the trial judge, nor motion to strike same from the record, motion for mistrial or motion for instruction to the jury to disregard the remarks were made in the trial court.

Therefore, we find these remarks not subject for review in this forum. See: Surrency v. State, 48 Fla. 59, 37 So. 575; Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791; Hysler v. State, 85 Fla. 153, 95 So. 573.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McCrea v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 21, 1968
Citation: 210 So. 2d 724
Docket Number: No. 67-757
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.