On July 10, 2002, McCorvey Development, Inc. filed a notice of appeal from a Gwinnett Superior Court judgment in favor of D. G. Jenkins Development Corporation in this contract action. The clerk of court mailed McCorvey’s counsel a bill of costs, which counsel received on July 15, 2002. On September 6, 2002, 53 days later, the trial court dismissed sua sponte McCorvey’s notice of appeal for failure to pay costs and failure to request an extension of time to pay costs. McCorvey appeals from this dismissal, contending the trial court erred in dismissing the notice of appeal without conducting a hearing to determine whether the delay in paying costs was inexcusable and whether such failure unreasonably delayed the transmission of the record to this Court. McCorvey also cites as error the trial court’s failure to make specific findings on this issue. Because we find *277 McCorvey was entitled to a hearing and findings on this issue, we reverse and remand this case to the trial court with direction.
Under OCGA § 5-6-48 (c), the trial court may dismiss an appeal, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing,
where there has been an unreasonable delay in the filing of the transcript and it is shown that the delay was inexcusable and was caused by such party. In like manner, the trial court may order the appeal dismissed where there has been an unreasonable delay in the transmission of the record to the appellate court, and it is seen that the delay was inexcusable and was caused by the failure of a party to pay costs in the trial court or file an affidavit of indigence.
See also
Holy Fellowship Church of God in Christ v. First Community Bank of Henry County,
The appellee in this case correctly argues that this Court has previously found that a delay of more than 30 days in paying costs is prima facie unreasonable and inexcusable. See
Bouldin v. Parker,
Therefore, in this case, McCorvey was entitled to notice and an opportunity to present evidence to rebut the presumption that its delay in paying costs was inexcusable and that such failure caused an unreasonable delay in the transmission of the record to this Court. We reverse the dismissal and remand this case to the trial
*278
court for a hearing and for written findings of fact on this issue. See
Wood v. Notte,
Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction.
