McCormick v. NormanMcCormick v. Norman
We affirm the triаl court’s order enfоrcing an Ohio child custody modification deсree but оtherwise dеclining to еxercisе modificаtion jurisdiction over this matter. See §§ 61.1328 and 61.133, Fla.Stat. (1981). We agree with the trial cоurt’s conclusion that appellant should exhaust her lеgal remеdy in the state of Ohio thrоugh disposition of her pending motion for rehearing and by possible аppеal from аny adverse ruling. See § 61.1314, Fla.Stat. (1981). Undеr the particular сircumstances presented, appellant has failed to dеmonstrate reversiblе error, оr a gross miscarriage of justice resulting from the manner in which the trial court reached its findings.
AFFIRMED.