midpage

McCormick v. CarrollMcCormick v. Carroll

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Nov 15, 1869
Reporters:
By the Court.

The court had power, at least before verdict, to allow an amendment of the levy, as is ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍clearly shown by the cases cited in argumerit. Whether it was reasonable to set aside the verdict for the purpose of hearing a motion to amend the levy is a question of discretion, which should be decided ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍by the court in which the trial was had; and which cannot properly be decided in this court, to which the whole case has not been brought. If the verdict should be set aside, and the amendment allowed ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍in the superior court, the question whether the levy in its present form is valid would become immaterial. The setting aside of the verdict and allowance of the amendment, which involve a question of fact, should be ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍disposed of before deciding the question of law presented by the ruling made at the trial; in order that the final judgment on the report in this court may be made upon the facts as they are ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍finally to rest.

Motion to set aside the verdict and amend the levy fo be heard in the superior court.

Case Details

Case Name: McCormick v. Carroll
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1869
Citation: 103 Mass. 151
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In