History
  • No items yet
midpage
McConnon v. Catalano
39 N.Y.2d 881
NY
1976
Check Treatment

Memorandum. If there was error in the trial court’s charge to the jury it was not preserved for review by this court (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 115, p 494). We have examined the appellants’ other contentions and find them to be without merit.

*883Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: McConnon v. Catalano
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 3, 1976
Citation: 39 N.Y.2d 881
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.