midpage

McConnell v. BakerMcConnell v. Baker

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 14, 1933
13652
Versions:169 S.E. 842
170 S.C. 111
1933 S.C. LEXIS 144

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

This appeal is from an order of Judge Foster of the Spartanburg County Court, which sustains the judgment for the respondent given in the Court of Magistrate Ballenger. The issues properly involved in the case are clearly stated in the order of Judge Foster, and are disposed of in a manner satisfactory to this Court. It is needless to review the authorities which our investigation has found to be applicable. It is sufficient to say that the strong majority opinions of these authorities are in consonance with the conclusions reached by the order of Judge Foster. The annotation attached to the case of Richmond Dry Goods Company v. Wil son, 105 W. Va., 221, 141 S. E., 876, 57 A. L. R., 31-33, and the opinion in that case itself, are especially in point. See, also, 39 C. J., 153, §§ 205, 206.

The exceptions are overruled and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Ret it be reported.

Mr. Chiee Justice Brease and Messrs. Justices StabrEr and Carter concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McConnell v. Baker
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Jun 14, 1933
Citations: 169 S.E. 842; 170 S.C. 111; 1933 S.C. LEXIS 144; 13652
Docket Number: 13652
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
Log In