History
  • No items yet
midpage
McConaghy v. Pemberton & Co.
168 Pa. 121
Pa.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The very able argument of the learned counsel for the appellants has failed to convince us of any error in the report of the referee. His report is so well sustained by the treatment he has given of the questions at issue that after a most patient and attentive reading of it in connection with the arguments of counsel, we have reached the conclusion to affirm the judgment upon the findings and conclusions contained in the report.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McConaghy v. Pemberton & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 13, 1895
Citation: 168 Pa. 121
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 271
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.