History
  • No items yet
midpage
McColskey v. Gainesville National Bank
78 Fla. 50
| Fla. | 1919
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

— This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg*51ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same i's hereby, affirmed.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McColskey v. Gainesville National Bank
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 1, 1919
Citation: 78 Fla. 50
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.