McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co.

92 N.J. Eq. 237 | N.J. | 1920

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes.

For affirmance—The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—14. For reversal—None