History
  • No items yet
midpage
McClendon v. State
260 So. 2d 255
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1972
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., to vacate a judgment and sentence imposed on defendant following a plea of guilty to aggravated assault. The motion alleged as the ground for relief that defendant was without counsel at the time he pled guilty. This allegation standing alone is insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850, CrPR. On this basis only we affirm the appealed order. Rose v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 353.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McClendon v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 11, 1972
Citation: 260 So. 2d 255
Docket Number: No. 71-797
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.