History
  • No items yet
midpage
McClelland v. Sheriff's Deputy
15 F. App'x 130
4th Cir.
2001
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen E. McClelland, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Stephen E. McClelland, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny McClelland’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McClelland v. Sheriff’s Deputy, No. CA-00-807 (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: McClelland v. Sheriff's Deputy
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 2, 2001
Citation: 15 F. App'x 130
Docket Number: 01-6653
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In