49 F. 477 | S.D.N.Y. | 1892
On the 19th of March, 1891, about 2:30 u. m. , the tide being flood, as the steam-tug Volunteer having a car-float on her starboard side, was passing Horn’s Hook in coming from the Harlem river, and intending to go down in the easterly channel past Blackwell’s island, her float came in collision with the libelant’s canal-boat Elbe], which was going up river in tow of the steam-tug Syracuse and on her starboard side, and the Ethel soon after sank. The libel was filed to recover the value of the canal-boat and cargo, with the personal effects of those on hoard.
There is considerable difference in the testimony concerning the precise place of the collision, whether immediately off Horn’s Hook at
Without entering further into the details of the conflicting testimony, no reason is shown on the part of the Volunteer why, after she gave her signal of two whistles and received the assenting answer of the Syracuse, which was on the yblunteer’s starboard bow, she did not shape her course more to port, so as to give more room for the Syracuse to pass between her and the shore. The Syracuse was coming up with a strong flood-tide, and there was the more reason, therefore, why the Volunteer should give her sufficient room to pass, and not block her way. The Galatea, 92 U. S. 439. She had no right to expect the Syracuse to come to a stand-still in such a tide-way as there was there, to enable her to avoid the Volunteer, when the Volunteer, by shaping .her course more to the left, could have avoided her. The Syracuse, on the other hand, did have the right to assume that the Volunteer would keep to port enough to let the Syracuse go past, as nothing prevented the Volunteer from doing so. The Volunteer, when she gave her signal of two whistles, was presumed to know what she could do, and on what to calculate; and in giving a signal of two whistles she took the risk of giving the Syracuse sufficient room to pass astern. The collision came from the miscalculation by the Volunteer as to the rapidity of the approach of the two vessels, and from her consequently going too near the point of the Hook.
I cannot find upon the evidence that the Syracuse was dilatory in backing; that is to say, that she did not reverse as soon as she had reason to suppose that the Volunteer was not shaping her course to port sufficiently and in time to allow the Syracuse room to pass. The Green-point, 31 Fed. Rep. 231; The F. & P. M. No. 2, 44 Fed. Rep. 701.