History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCaskill Investment Co. v. Bank of Thomasville
104 Fla. 300
| Fla. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record and the decree herein and the brief and argument of counsel *Page 301 for the appellant and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree. It is therefore considered, ordered, and decreed by the court that the said decree of the Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McCaskill Investment Co. v. Bank of Thomasville
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Feb 19, 1932
Citation: 104 Fla. 300
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.