In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for sexual harassment and wrongful termination pursuant to Executive Law article 15, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered October 28, 1993, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against Pall Corporation, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion, dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against Pall Corporation, and severing the action against the remaining defendants; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendants’ submission of evidence of the plaintiff’s fraud acquired after her discharge from employment does not entitle them to judgment as a matter of law (see, Reinach v Wisehart,
However, the order appealed from must be modified, and the complaint dismissed insofar as it is asserted against Pall Corporation, because the plaintiff failed to set forth sufficient facts to warrant piercing the corporate veil of Pall Corporation (see, Pebble Cove Homeowners’ Assn. v Fidelity N. Y. FSB,
