History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCarthy v. McCarthy
696 A.2d 986
Conn.
1997
Check Treatment

Dissenting Opinion

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant certification to appeal on the following important issue in this case in which the Appellate Court summarily affirmed the judgment of the trial court: “Whether the trial court correctly held that as a matter of law it was restricted *917to granting sole custody because the parties did not agree on joint custody and because one party sought joint custody (husband) and the other party sought sole custody (wife) and there was no motion for conciliation?”

William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition. Christine A. Janis, in opposition. Decided June 5, 1997





Lead Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 930 (AC 15209), is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: McCarthy v. McCarthy
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jun 5, 1997
Citation: 696 A.2d 986
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.