History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCarthy v. Masters
142 Pa. 82
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
1891
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

There is nothing for us to review in this case. The first assignment does not conform to the Rules of Court, and the second has nothing to sustain it. We can see no error in “entering judgment in accordance with the findings of the referee.”

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McCarthy v. Masters
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County
Date Published: Apr 27, 1891
Citation: 142 Pa. 82
Docket Number: No. 80
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.