History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCarthy v. Brainard
178 N.Y.S.2d 403
N.Y. App. Div.
1958
Check Treatment

The question here is limited to whether the Commissioner of Welfare is entitled to reimbursement for the cost of maintaining the dependents of this incompetent *1030after the appointment of the committee and until the time of the application. We hold that if the estate of the incompetent is sufficiently large there is no reason why his obligation to support his dependents should not be enforced. The Federal statute (U. S. Code, tit. 38, § 3001, subd. [a]) does not prohibit recovery in such a ease. However, we feel that the estate of this incompetent is hardly enough to provide for the incompetent’s needs in the event of contingencies affecting his welfare. In the circumstances the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: McCarthy v. Brainard
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 7, 1958
Citation: 178 N.Y.S.2d 403
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.