147 N.W. 718 | N.D. | 1914
Plaintiff and defendant were married February 18, 1911, and shortly thereafter went to live upon a farm owned by plaintiff’s father, near Cando, North Dakota. It appears from the record that
From tbe extracts given and from tbe rest of tbe testimony which we have carefully read and weighed, we have reached tbe conclusion tbat tbe decree was not obtained by fraud, coercion, and deceit. We have before us tbe identical affidavits tbat were acted upon by tbe trial court, and feel tbat be was wrong, and it is our duty to so bold.
While the public is interested in all divorce suits, it is not so particularly interested in the division of property. The defendant insists that her husband did not want the divorce, and did not even know about it; but this is not borne out by his letters, and is contradicted by the admitted fact that he has not remarried her.
The trial court will reinstate the decree.