McCann v. RodiferMcCann v. Rodifer
- Reporters:
- Before:
- Howk
— The paper writing filed in this cause by the appellant, and endorsed as his brief, is merely a copy of the pleading in the record. It •suggests no reason for the reversal of the judgment, it makes no argument, and it cites no authority. It is not a brief of the cause within the requirements of the rules and decisions of this court. Bray v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 68 Ind. 6; Wilson v. Holloway, 70 Ind. 407; City of Anderson v. Neal, 88 Ind. 317.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.