History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCall v. State
162 So. 2d 526
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1964
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appealed order, denying application for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, was predicated on insufficiency of allegation in the motion for relief and must be affirmed. See Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766. Since the disposition of the motion in the lower court did not reach the merits of appellant’s claim, the order and our affirmance are without prejudice to any subsequent proceedings on proper motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963).

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McCall v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 3, 1964
Citation: 162 So. 2d 526
Docket Number: No. 4203
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.