History
  • No items yet
midpage
McBride v. State
133 S.E. 877
Ga. Ct. App.
1926
Check Treatment
Beoyi.es, C. J.

1. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, not having been argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

2. The verdict was authorized by’ the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McBride v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 15, 1926
Citation: 133 S.E. 877
Docket Number: 17312
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.