History
  • No items yet
midpage
McBride v. State
1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 79
Ala. Ct. App.
1923
Check Treatment

Defendant was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and, from the judgment overruling his motion for new trial, he appeals.

The bill of exceptions fails to state that it contains all of the evidence, and, in the absence of this statement, we must presume there was other and sufficient evidence to support the verdict. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McBride v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 10, 1923
Citation: 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 79
Docket Number: 8 Div. 967.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.