History
  • No items yet
midpage
McBride v. Murray
25 N.Y.S. 431
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1893
Check Treatment
TEE CURIAM.

• It is undoubtedly true that a mandamus Will lie to compel an inferior tribunal to decide an action or proceeding pending before it; but where the court or judge or justice disposes of the proceeding by decision, even though such decision he manifestly erroneous, it cannot be reviewed upon mandamus. Cases cited in Fiero, Spec. Proc. p. 56. In the case at bar the justice determined that he had not jurisdiction, and that disposed of the -action or proceeding pending before him. Whether he had jurisdiction or not must be reviewed in the ordinary way. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case Details

Case Name: McBride v. Murray
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 13, 1893
Citation: 25 N.Y.S. 431
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.