M'Carty v. Sherman
3 Johns. 429 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1808
The objection to the certificate of the former justice, as evidence, was well founded. It ought to have been proved by the justice himself, who gave the judgment, or a sworn copy of his minutes should have been produced. In the case of Kellogg v. Mauney, the evidence of the certificate was not objected to, and was, therefore, considered as admitted. The judgment below must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
