History
  • No items yet
midpage
McAllister v. Douglas
1 Cranch 241
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1805
Check Treatment
THE COURT

being divided

(FITZHUGH. Circuit Judge, absent),

the instruction was not given. KILTY, Chief Judge, thought no instruction should be given to the jury. CRANCH, Chief Judge, was of opinion that the jury should be instructed that they ought to make the price of flour on the day of demand and refusal, and interest thereon, the rule of damages for the non-delivery.

The jury gave damages according to the price on the 19th of November, which was the day the cause of action accrued, the negotiation for a compromise having on that day failed.

Judgment affirmed by supreme court, 3 Cranch [7 U. S.) 298.

Case Details

Case Name: McAllister v. Douglas
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Jun 15, 1805
Citation: 1 Cranch 241
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.