midpage

Mazzola v. KellyMazzola v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 25, 2002
Versions:291 A.D.2d 535
738 N.Y.S.2d 246
2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2008

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant We Transport, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated March 30, 2001, which denied as premature its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff has not yet had an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery into several relevant issues that are exclusively within the knowledge of the appellant (see, CPLR 3212 [f]; Firesearch Corp. v Micro Computer Controls Corp., 240 AD2d 365, 366; Baron v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 143 AD2d 792). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied, as premature, the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mazzola v. Kelly
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 25, 2002
Citations: 291 A.D.2d 535; 738 N.Y.S.2d 246; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2008
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In