History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mays v. State
450 So. 2d 299
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Mays’ conviction for the crime of third degree murder. We reverse, however, Mays’ conviction for the crime of grand theft because that crime was a predicate supporting the murder conviction. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983); Boivin v. State, 436 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review granted, No. 64,368 (Fla. Mar. 30, 1984). We reverse the reservation of jurisdiction over the sentence on the authority of Pope v. State, 441 So.2d 1073 (Fla.1983), and Owen v. State, 441 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Case Details

Case Name: Mays v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 15, 1984
Citation: 450 So. 2d 299
Docket Number: No. 83-831
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.