History
  • No items yet
midpage
May's Estate
259 Pa. 115
Pa.
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The provision in the will of the testatrix for Mary E. McManemy, now Mary E. Mulliken, was for income only, and, with the codicil’s revocation of that provision* there was, as the court below correctly held, an intestacy as to such income, without affecting the testamentary disposition of the corpus or principal from which it accrued : Reiehard’s App., 116 Pa. 232.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Case Details

Case Name: May's Estate
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 30, 1917
Citation: 259 Pa. 115
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 230
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.